Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 25.06.2025 01:53
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Darwin Loved Worms. They May Have Just Proved Him Wrong About Evolution. - Yahoo
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
China Set for Critical Orbital Refueling Test With 2 U.S. Satellites Watching Closely - Gizmodo
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
401(k) Stats Suggest Americans Still Confident - Newser
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Breast cancer makes Hull man 'feel like an imposter' - BBC
What’s next?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Why is it that women are stronger than men nowadays?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
These are the key witnesses who testified against Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs so far - CNN
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Scientists identify two global ocean bands heating at record rates - Earth.com